Main menu:

Categories

Archive

More Blog Fun

Bad Parenting
Damn Onions

Site search

Subscribe

RSS
Facebook
Twitter

Follow Us

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Popular Entries

Extras

Get your own free Blogoversary button!

Click for fun and bizarre Hello Kitty items
Rare Sanrio Products from Japan

Hello Kitty Dog Tattoo


There are a lot of things that are just plain wrong with Hello Kitty fanatics. Getting a Hello Kitty tattoo is one of them. Getting a Hello Kitty Star Wars tattoo is even worse. But when Hello Kitty fanatics start tattooing their dog with Hello Kitty, there has been a boundary that has been crossed. Can there be a bigger insult if you are a dog? Having to go around in life with a Hello Kitty tattoo because you owner thought it would be “cute.” That dog must have been teased mercilessly by the other dogs at the park…

Hello Kitty tattoo dog

Hello Kitty dog tattoo

Which leads me to my latest Hello Kitty fear. If a Hello Kitty fanatic would be willing to place a Hello Kitty tattoo on their dog, then obviously my wife would have no problem tattooing me with Hello Kitty. I think I’m going to have to be extra careful from now on when I go out drinking or I may end up with they same exact Hello Kitty Hell that dog must endure…

This was sent in by a number of readers including hellopink, Tim, Hayley and cuterthanu – may all of you have to wear a Hello Kitty tattoo yourself…

If you enjoyed this post and want to see more, please sign up for our rss feed, twitter posts or become a fan on Facebook

Comments

  • Alicia says:

    Wow! That is horriable! Why would anyone do that to a dog or any other animal. I like hello kitty but this is wrong!

  • Titty says:

    Okay, I wonder what SHE looks like if her dog has a tattoo. She must have full blown tattoo sleeves and her back has no virgin skin left.

    I think the dog killed herself.

  • Serena says:

    I am a Hello Kitty fan but you’re right this has crossed the line. Keep in mind this isn’t Sanrio’s project it was a fan’s. I do have a huge Hello Kitty collection and want nothing more in the world but to own all the stuff taht your wife has but I would never go so far as to tattoo an animal! That is just cruel.

  • saphiestar says:

    That’s just creepy.

  • Neko-chan says:

    I hope that the dog will never turn back home XD
    I feel really sad for him….

    I think he’s going around the city wondering to cancel that owful tatoo from his back….

  • Laiane says:

    It could be for identification purposes, in case you need to have “proof of ownership.” To prevent dognapping? I’m just brainstorming.

    I have my orange tabby cat microchipped, but I would never tattoo him.

    I dislike dogs, but not enough to tattoo one with Hello Kitty.

  • Kari Rose says:

    I’m an avid member of BMEzine (body modification site) and this photograph was featured on Modblog.

    The owner of the dog didn’t tattoo it because it was cute, it was for identification purposes and they wanted their mark to be unique. I mean, c’mon, you don’t see many dogs with Hello Kitty tattoos, do you?

    In fact, the owner of the dog doesn’t even LIKE Hello Kitty, so you shouldn’t brand her a ‘fanatic’

  • kookyknut says:

    I also read modblog, I think the reason they tattooed hello kitty is because the dog was forever humping cats.

  • Cade says:

    That’s beyond cruel. The dog probably ran away from its owner to save itself from the stupidy that was radiating from its owner.

    If she wanted a Hello Kitty tattoo so badly she should have gotten one herself. What a friggin’ moron.

    Kari Rose: That whole statement is ignorant. You’re right, though, it doesn’t make the owner a Hello Kitty “fanatic”- it just makes her an idiot.

  • ABH says:

    I hope they find that poor pooch!VERY sad! Sometimes people tattoo pets for ID reasons.It’s safe & can make a difference in finding a lost pet.

  • Elle says:

    Get real. Her and the Vet should be prosecuted for animal curelty. Want to tag the dog? Go to any PETA or SPCA site and there a lot of less cruel tagging methods then a tattoo.

    The fact it’s HK just makes it beyond stupid. It makes her irresponsible. MOST animals that have to get tattoos, get one that’s small. This is decoration. (And for the record, yes I like HK, but I’ll be damed if I’d put her on ME much less my pet. At the VERY least…shouldn’t she have put Pochacco on it?)

  • Meiko says:

    Hello from Thailand!

    I’ve read through your blog.. I mean all entries!! and it’s quite nightmare for the one who dislike or hate this little pinky winky kitten (=o=!!!)

    I’m not Hello Kitty’s fan and I don’t hate Hello Kitty but! Hello Kitty Tattoo makes me sick! (=[]=!!) Like OMG! even the dog has Hello Kitty tattoo!?!?

    but I hope they can find their dog (with Hello Kitty tattoo as a logo!!)

  • Kari Rose says:

    The dog went missing quite a long time ago, so it’s either been found or still missing.

    Tattooing animals isn’t as bad as it seems. It’s popular for owners who are body modded to modify their animals as long as they are at no extra risk. The poster states that the tattoo was done under anesthesia therefore the dog would of felt nothing.

    I know somebody who had a Pikachu head tattooed on the underbelly of their cat, so if it was lost and shaved, she would be more recognizable. Does it make a difference if its Hello Kitty or a Pikachu or a frog or something.

  • ABH says:

    DO NOT be so judgemental! The dog was NOT hurt by the tattoo & it might very well help bring it home.It is NOT cruel!!!

  • papiercherri says:

    Maybe not a fanatic, just stupid. There are more humane ways to tag a dog. If your going to give a dog a tattoo for identification purposes, why not the owners name and phone number or something? (And even that\’s ridiculous…) Or perhaps the microchip…which actually tracks the pet so you can find them. A f***in\’ HK tattoo…

  • liz says:

    i shaved my dog once…because it was very hot…..
    he was soooo pissed.
    if i tattooed him a hellokitty, i might have to run for my live.

    microchip’s invented for a reason…

  • Kari Rose says:

    I am sorry, but surely microchips cannot be good for your pet. Putting a little device under their skin that can be trackable years later..hmm.

    Surprised they haven’t put them in humans yet.

    In my opinion I think a electronic microchip getting inserted below a pets skin is worse than a tattoo for identification purposes. I’d honestly tattoo my pet instead of putting a tag under its skin.

  • Melissa says:

    that\’s messed up. Not right at all- if i were to find that dog i would be DAMN sure she never got it back. That\’s abuse- plain and simple…

  • Angi says:

    Oh dear… that’s horrible! Poor dog :(

  • Jennifer says:

    Tattooing a cat on your dog is just perverse.

  • Lolly says:

    Although I know my pooches would look adorable in Hello Kitty pj’s, I would never subject them to wearing a cutie kitty.

  • Suzanne says:

    At first I thought it was messed up but if its for identification purposes, its actually a very good idea. Many vets carry different micro-chip reading devices so you might get a micro-chip imbedded in your pet and then it gets lost and when its found, there will be no record of your pet in the place where its found (do you get what I mean?) because there are more than one micro-chip systems running in the US right now. This is actually an ingenious way to identify your pet. The problem is now that is been released on the net, other people may copy and it may not be so individualized anymore.

  • Trish says:

    That is just CRUEL. A vanity tattoo on a dog is not right! A dog can’t choose to have a tattoo like people. That is animal cruelty!

  • Trish says:

    I also just realized WHERE it is! Near the poor baby’s nipple! WTF? Who DOES that??

  • Claudia says:

    I can’t believe this idiot thought it was ok to tattoo her dog….Hello kitty lover or not, this is just CRUEL. She should be arrested for animal cruelty and the vet should be stripped of their license.

  • Stevie says:

    All my dogs are tatooed. Not with Hello Kitty, but they all have ID tatoos. Difficult to remove, easy to read, universally compatible unlike microchip readers,… I know a lot of tatooists if you’re looking for one. BTW – for safety, always on the inner flank or stomach, NEVER the ear. That’s too easy for a thief to chop off. And THAT’s cruel and all too common.

  • Bianca says:

    That is totaly insain and realy sick to tatoo a dog

  • d says:

    so this is the first time i have ever read one of your entries, and you are too funny, best week ever here you come watch out dane cook, there is a man in hello kitty hell commin..

  • Melanie says:

    I have put alot of thought to this and I really dont understnad why you would wont to tattoo your animals and I do understand it would be a good way of I identifacation but and the same time if you were going to do something like that why dont you just get get one of those chips with the taracking divise in it so when he ran away you could have called and they would have told you were he was. A tattoo of the other hand could be coverd up and you would never be able to prove it was you pet in the first place !

  • Elise says:

    In response to Melissa’s last post: how could you cover a tattoo on a dog so that it wouldn’t show? Besides, who cares if it’s a hello kitty tattoo, the dog doesn’t know. I think that a microchip and tattoo are equally as bad. Both the place of insertion of a chip and a tattoo could get infected. If I get my puppy in February, it’s going to be an expensive dog and maybe I would want a tattoo or something so that I could get my dog back if someone took him. If the dog didn’t feel them give the tattoo, then I don’t see what the big deal is. People do a lot worse (i.e.: rubber banding/chopping off tails, ear clipping, etc.) when the dogs can feel it.

  • Becca says:

    I have the SAME tattoo as that dog! What a disgrace! lol

  • Hope-Elaine Ramos says:

    I LOVE HELLO KITTY. ANYTHING I CAN GET MY HANDS ON I WILL, WILL BUY. BUT THIS IS STUPID I WOULD NEVER DO THAT TO MY DOG I HOPE THESE PEOPLE GO TO HELL.

  • you can kill your dog by doin that sick freak

  • jeska says:

    i understand the whole tattoo for identity thing, but a number/ address or just a simple logo design would be more suitable, smaller and less likely to get infected. the fact that there is colour on it proves to me that it has an element of “decoration” to it which in my opinion is unecessary for identification purposes. i like hello kitty but not to that extent. if your gonna do it, get a microchip or a tattoo that is small, painless and suitable for its purpose. cruelty to animals is wrong. full stop.

  • Frank says:

    THE HUMAN SOCIETY RECOMENDS TATTOOS FOR YOUR PETS AND TELLS YOU ABOUT THE DOGS NERVE ENDINGS AND WHY IT DOES NOT HURT THE DOG

  • Christy says:

    Ya, the dog must had killed itself….. This is horrible and terrible!
    I am a Hello Kitty Fan, and had 3 dogs, but I had never done such a sick thing to do it on them! If I am the dog, I would tear off my skin after that tattoo is on me(even though i am a fan) !
    Hope that owner would never had her dog back….

  • Jo says:

    What is that orange thing the dog has?

  • who cares says:

    I don’t see the big deal. The dog didn’t feel the tattoo and the dog doesn’t see or care about the tattoo. I love my pets and I don’t think it’s so bad. After all, it’s a unique way of identifying it. Plus, that other person was right…there are a few different microchip systems. I mean, the tattoo would be something completely unique so you can prove it’s your animal.

  • Ridiculous says:

    OMG..I have never in my life seen such a ridiculous argument about something so stupid. There is a lot worse going on in this world than to waste your time in a chat room fighting about a HELLO KITTY tattoo. HAHA u all should be ashamed of yourselves. Is everybody in here like 12 and can’t find it in themselves to just say whatever. Who gives a shit besides the owners of the dog and the dog itself. Dogs normally forgive their owners for taking them to the vet to get routine vaccinations. This damn dog was under sedation!!! Are your dogs sedated while getting shots? Go do something worthwhile with your time like help somebody!
    I could seriously laugh for a whole day about this.

  • jacq says:

    you guys are stupid. if tattooing is ok for people it should be ok For pets.people dont even get put under for tattoos.
    pets are hurt/killed giving birth to litters of their young.
    guess they shouldnt be allowed to do that either.

  • James says:

    I think all of you who think that this is wrong and think that this is animal abuse or cruelty are completely judging somebody you don’t know. Let’s think for a second what we do to ourselves. Women pierce their ears because they think its a custom, it looks pretty, its fun to wear jewelry. But… what about those women who haven’t gotten any piercings? People its called CHOICE. and yes your right that dog didn’t have a choice. but neither did the cows that got tags on their ears, or the cattle that got branded, or the dogs and cats that got spayed or neutered (personally I think anyone who takes those two last things away from a cat or dog is animal cruelty but I know it serves its purpose.) So for those of you who think that this picture is wrong, why don’t you instead think about the reason why this dog owner may have done it. That dog didn’t run away intentionally. I know that my pets which I love very much and take care of them as much as I would my own children have at one point or another gotten out of the house and trying to find them can be very emotional for me. This owner may have opened the door and the dog may have naturally wanted to explore outside it’s territory. With all seriousness, YOU PEOPLE MAKE ME SICK worrying about something like this. Open up your eyes and read carefully, the dog was not hurt. it was sedated and I know for a fact that tattooing dogs and cats is not a new thing for id purposes.

    microchip my *&& I can already see it. “Oh look honey a lost puppy, quick go get the microchip scanner! You know the one you bought me for Christmas last year!”

    Grow up people.

  • James says:

    To be real honest with all of you… I believe that a bunch of people who are “hellokitty” worries me more than a person tattooing their dog that they so much love and with it would come home. do yourselves a favor… feed a starving child or something useful.

  • milly says:

    Thats horrible !!!!!!!!!

    For the dog ,, how mean

  • tulip says:

    I understand wanting to put a tattoo on your pet, for identification purposes. There are alot of cats in my neighborhood that look like my cats, if one of the got out, I’d fear that she’d never come home. A tattoo would at least help identify her.

    Ferrets get tattoos frequently, if you go to a pet store and look in the ears (or sometimes under the arm) of the little babies you’ll see one or two little dots. It identifies the breeder they came from.

    So, i understand the desire for a tattoo for your pet… but a hello kitty tattoo? That’s just cruel.

  • hannah M says:

    WOW i think thats really bad who would do that to a dog i feel sorry for it. the dog should be taken of them if thats what their doing to it right, it must of hurt as well if it hurts humans then it will hurt it defo

    give the dog a REST!

  • hm. says:

    who ever sed the tattoo doesnt hurt the dog is stupid.
    they feel pain too. if you got a tattoo it guarenteed to hurt,
    and they feel pain more than us. dogs squeal if u cut their
    toenail. :|
    they do feel pain. and putting a tattoo on your dog is a really
    terrible thing to do. not to mention sad. losers..
    micro chips are better. they store info on the dog like its name,
    address & number. its not like your just gonna tattoo their
    address under the hello kitty tattoo. my god.

  • lauren says:

    i agree with the person above. give them a rest! their not human; theyre compleatly different. dogs are our companions not a hello kitty billboard!!

  • Jillian says:

    You are all either ignoring parts of this because you cant read properly or because you want to automatically label someone as an animal abuser, seriously. THE DOG WAS SEDATED. Also, I wouldnt ever put my address, people MOVE you know, Im sure most of you have done that once or twice at least during your lives. Names are also not as reliable. How many female white and brown jack russells do you think have hello kitty tattoo’d on their bellies. Probably not many. Also, the majority of the time that an animal is found its NOT by someone who HAS an ID scanner.
    I can assure you the dog doesnt even realize its there, or if it does its hardly worrying about it “OMG what will the other dogs at the park think of THIS!?!”. Please.

Pingbacks

Leave a Reply

*