Comments on: Hello Kitty Batman Tattoo

By: nichole aka skater1776

nichole aka skater1776 — Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:55:01 +0000

HAIR…. thats all i see

By: Bender

Bender — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:29:39 +0000

Seriously the last time i’ve been on this site must be like 3 years ago yet it grew huge til now O_O (am still amazed and dizzied).
Above all i don’t want to be contemptuous in any way but anyone seriously adoring “such stuff” would get a “go and do some drugs” from me. Seriously there are better ways to spend your money (even if you “intentionally want to waste it”). Well asian hellokitty emo-g”u”rls are tempting yet I’d have to pass, though the girl’s probably pretty nice/cute (without that tattoo ofc) -.-. Due to the fact I’d have to worry about sanity issues or serious mental problems.
Above all i agree totally with silent bob,
cheers dude !

By: ty

ty — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:02:00 +0000

-fair enough who would like to see that crap tatoo when your wife is lusciously awesome-! Hello T*ttY-licious! T*tty and Kitty

By: Frankii

Frankii — Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:21:36 +0000

FFS.
The tattoo look pretty cool, I’m a massive HK fan, but its going to be there for the rest of her life. Or she’s going to have to go through a LOT of pain to get rid of it.
Whether she’s beautiful or not has NOTHING to do with the post. The post is about the tattoo.
PLUS, how many guys are saying she’s beautiful and actually lookin at her face? I’m guessing none.
You all need to grow up and realise there’s more to women than tits.
Oh, and realise, that women use special things called make-up and photoshop to make themselves look better (yes that’s sarcasm).

At the end of the day it’s damn pathetic how you’ve made this into a bitch fest of how great her boobs are or how ugly she is.
I thought this was HKH, not ogle-her-tits-n-dis-her-face.com.
But that’s obviously what you all care about more.

By: Random

Random — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:04:36 +0000

I do not get it, I think she looks gorgeous.
She got the Mortitia from the munsters and a vampiretress look. I like it.

By: Shiromaku

Shiromaku — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:20:29 +0000

I wasn’t expected to see that. DX soooooo disturbing!

By: metal m myke

metal m myke — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:46:53 +0000

those eyebrows, and that ugly ass mole has GOT TO GO,

By: Vortac

Vortac — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:59:48 +0000

A clarification; when I say ‘shoes’ etc. are not natural, I of course mean a LUST for them is clearly not dictated by our genes, or anything else in our biology. Thus being something nature did not intend – an artificial and twisted urge that should not exist.

But breasts have many functions, one of them is to sexually arouse men – and you hypocrite women KNOW it, you USE it and still have the nerve to come here to whine about it, although you clearly benefit from it! That big-egoed sad goth-hag in the picture knows this and uses this. If she had the tattoo in her arm, she couldn’t get as many men interested in it when she wants to show it. Notice how she’s not really wearing much although she could very well be without the tattoo being disturbed.

It’s cruel and deliberate manipulation on the women’s part – first they arouse the men with their breasts and then they try to make the men feel guilty about it! Can you GET any more diabolical than that?

- Vortac

By: Vortac

Vortac — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:56:08 +0000

What is it with guys and breasts, someone asked. Well, that’s BIOLOGY, it’s natural. What is it with women and hellokitty’s, shoes, handbags, rich men – those are -NOT- natural by any means. So before you bash men, try to answer my questions first. Then we can go to the explanation of breasts functions as a sexual arouser (why do women show so much cleavage and make sure they show as much breasts and cleavage as possible if they don’t think it will make any impact on men, huh?) among other things.

- Vortac

By: Mudfish

Mudfish — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:33:39 +0000

I love her hair. That’s all I have to say.